User’s Guide | Rules | Contact a Moderator | Registration or Login Problems? | Eating Disorders Learning Center | F.E.A.S.T.

Custom Search of F.E.A.S.T. and Forum Content:
Register Latest Topics

  Author   Comment   Page 3 of 3      Prev   1   2   3

Posts: 1,792
Reply with quote  #51 
Dear wheresmywand,

State Not Weight is also what a lot of really good clinicians/professionals also use. The New Plates Podcast with Dr Rebecka Peebles one of the F.E.A.S.T clinical advisory panel members, gives a great discussion from a professional clinicians perspective.

ED Dad

Posts: 11
Reply with quote  #52 
Urghhh, the battle has started. Over the last few days I've been mentioning to H that we will probably need to go above the CAMHS target range to see true and long lasting recovery and he has taken that on board. Yesterday we received a copy of an update letter our therapist had sent to GP confirming in black and white that target range is 25th-50th centile 57.8-62.7kg. She had an individual session with the therapist a couple of days ago and weight was 59.4kg. Between them they decided to drop afternoon snack so we are now on 3 meals and supper and an extra snack on dance day, the idea behind this I'm told is to demonstrate that D can control her weight and is not just going to keep putting weight on. After tea yesterday D and I were chatting and she mentioned that maybe her body needs to be 12stone (the weight she was before this all started and the weight she is terrified of going back to) I said "maybe it does"..cue ED eruption. Took a couple of hours to talk her down (including locking herself in bathroom and vomiting-something she's not done before (lock now removed)) She is now stuck between either "Mum, who I trusted, just wants to make me fat again" OR "The therapist, who I trusted, is lying to me".   She did calm down eventually and eat supper.  

Going to call therapist on Monday to discuss, any other evidence you guys have to hand that I can put to therapist and help me with this would be massively appreciated. In the meantime we will "just keep swimming" xx


Posts: 755
Reply with quote  #53 
Hi doris,
so sorry that it is more difficult at the moment, I hope it will be better soon.
I do not really understand what you write, maybe it is my bad english. The therapist says to GP she needs to be 57,8-62,7? That is a range of 5 kg!!!
HE decides to drop afternoon snack with her without speaking with you before that??? Dropping the afternoon snack means that she has now no food between lunch and supper which is a way too long time and that can be very triggering.
Is he talking to her about target weight? Is she weighed blind?
Your d seem to know better than the "professionals" that she needs to gain more to feel free. She is afraid of that, but that is normal.
If you stop now and cut the afternoon snack she will be down below 57,8 in 2 weeks or so. Is that the goal?
A target range between 25 and 50 is a too big range. When she was on 50, she should go back on 50 and not below that.

How is her behaviour? State, not weight. If there is no AN behaviour left, you can stop.
The vomitting is a very severe symptom that it is too early to give her freedom back. You do not want to change AN in BN.
Tell the therapist that YOU decide to cut out snacks when YOU think it is the right time. Tell him she needs to be on higher percentile and get the GP into the boat. Tell him that she has vomitted.

I can get so angry when I hear what these so-called "professionals" destroy in a couple of minutes...
I forgot to say great that hubby is on board. Best information in your post!


Avatar / Picture

Lead Moderator
Posts: 3,392
Reply with quote  #54 
I can imagine your frustration. Great that your husband is on board, that is a part of the battle. 

I think the important thing is to challenge the therapist - why set a target range of less than the 50th centile? If D was bigger than average before it makes no sense to try to squeeze her body into less than average and hope that she is going to recover. 
I also think the very concept of her "controlling her weight" is one that is bound to lead to further issues. In full recovery she eats without thinking about her weight. She eats because she enjoys it, because she needs fuel and not to control her weight. 

Unfortunately there is little research on target weight that support being above the 50th centile. Most papers unfortunately talk about BMI of 19 -20 rather than looking at normal ranges. 

D diagnosed restrictive AN June 2010 age 13.5. Weight restored July 2012. Relapse and now clawing our way back. Treatment: multiple hospitalisations and individual and family therapy.

Posts: 235
Reply with quote  #55 
Hi Doris, our gp also told my d she could drop supper at the beginning of the year. That didn't last long as her anxiety increased and her sleep suffered. So I introduced supper again gradually, letting her choose and guiding her. So she would pick a fruit the first couple of days. Then I asked her to add something with protein until she was having a proper supper again. This illness doesn't go away at a certain magical weight. I wish the 'experts' could understand this.
Best off luck, Doris, you got this!

D became obsessed with exercise at age 9. Started eating 'healthy' at age 9.5. Restricting couple of months later. IP for 2 weeks at age 10. Slowly refed for a year and WR at age 11 in March 2017. She is back to her old happy self and can eat anything put in front of her. Now working on intuitive eating.

Posts: 188
Reply with quote  #56 
So sorry this has happened! I hate it when these professionals who are NOT living in our homes decide to make big decisions like that!! 
This makes me upset. I wonder if you print this thread off and show them (without D knowing) what they would think; That all these people from around the world, who have lived this in techincolour 3D , are supporting you to feed her more!!! A thousand voices with real life experience cannot be wrong!

Tell them to watch all the videos here on "state not weight" then to come back to you and tell you the weight ranges. Sorry I am just livid at this.

You know what to do- I stand with you. You got this. I am pleased that your H is on board. 
Big hugs.

Avatar / Picture

Posts: 4,773
Reply with quote  #57 
It is kinda weird that the good folks here (who had never met my d, and hadn't even seen a photo) were the only ones who were correct about how much weight my d needed.  Everyone else's opinion was at least 5 kg too low.

So glad you are seeing less resistance, but please remember that it might increase again.  My d was adamantly against that last 5 kg ... the ones that brought her back to health.  I should say that ED was adamantly against them - now that my d is back, she seems fine with her weight.  Well, sadly, young ladies never seem pleased with their weight, but she is back to normal on her self-image I think.    xx


"We are angels of hope, of healing, and of light. Darkness flees from us." -YP 

Posts: 364
Reply with quote  #58 
Doris, this really stinks. I'd drop this therapist and this GP, but I guess you don't have choices.

What you can say, and what I said as I ignored various bits of bad advice from practitioners in favor of the GOOD advice here, was "These people are MY consultants. They give their advice, but I have the final say. I have more specialized advice that I follow."

Posts: 755
Reply with quote  #59 
Hi mamaroo,
"our gp also told my d she could drop supper at the beginning of the year"
No words. Can you show me one normal eating person (not dieting) who would drop supper?
Great that you could turn that around.

No matter who gives you that "advice" and how "professional" they seem, DO NOT STOP REFEEDING until you see real change in behaviour.
If you once stop you will need double power for restart.

Posts: 72
Reply with quote  #60 
Hi Doris,

That SUCKS!!

I wondered if any of those links I mentioned from tooth fairy about 4-5 pages back would be helpful to print out for T - there is one there from kartini about the dangers of setting target weights too low. If they aren't going to listen to you they may get the picture when you hand them some printed information from experts that could help support your case. It does sound like deep down your daughter knows what she needs but can't be seen by ED to be countenancing that.
GGRRR makes me [mad]

Swim on Dory x

PS Thanks AEDF dad, I have watched that now.

17 yr old daughter dx RAN Jan 16, but starting restricting some months before that. Let go too early and now back home gaining weight again, slowly challenging fear foods and entrenched 'healthy, pure' eating habits and behaviours.
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.

F.E.A.S.T. Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders
is a 501(c)3 charitable organization committed to maintaining the Around the Dinner Table forum as a FREE service for any caregiver of a loved-one with an eating disorder.

P.O. Box 1281 | Warrenton, VA 20188 USA

US +1 855-50-FEAST | Canada +1 647-247-1339 | Australia +61 731886675 | UK +443308280031 

This forum is sponsored by F.E.A.S.T., an organization of parents serving parents and caregivers of patients of all ages with anorexia, bulimia, and other eating disorders. Information and advice given on this forum does not necessarily represent the policy or opinion of F.E.A.S.T. or its volunteers and is meant to support, not replace, professional consultation.

F.E.A.S.T. is registered as a nonprofit organization under section 501(c)(3) of the United States Internal Revenue Code.

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Community Rules | Forum Rules | F.E.A.S.T. Principles | YMadmin | WTadmin
Custom Search of F.E.A.S.T. and Forum Content: